New names have dominated Premier League managerial appointments in the last two years, but there is some evidence that these less-familiar faces are being given even less time than ‘experienced’ Premier League managers to improve their teams.
Four Premier League clubs appointed new managers this summer; three of these appointments were new to the league (van Gaal, Koeman, Irvine) whilst the fourth, Mauricio Pochettino, was himself a Premier League rookie just 16 months earlier.
This summer marked the 10-year anniversary of Arsenal completing their Invincibles season; a team remembered not only as a ruthless winning machine but also for being totally unlike anything previously seen in English football.
There has been plenty of good writing on The Invincibles – indeed this post was inspired by Dennis Bergkamp’s recent autobiography – and this blog won’t attempt to compete with these pieces. Instead, 5 Added Minutes is more concerned by the question: how unlikely were The Invincibles?
I’ve spent too many hours watching test cricket wondering when the next wicket will arrive. Two batters, both set – how many runs can we expect them to accumulate at the crease? And, as the old adage goes, does one really bring two?
Firstly, how long does a top order partnerships tend to last? Surprisingly, the answer is not long; 25% of these partnerships make 8 runs or less.
Who have you enjoyed watching the most and least during this World Cup? Please take this survey to help me establish the tournament’s most popular teams:
Sometimes the best teams at a World Cup aren’t well-loved, so I’m interested to see which countries have won fans, if not points, during the tournament.
Results to follow if I can manage a few hundred responses – so please share with your friends!
Close cup finals often seem to be decided by momentum. After all, if two teams are evenly-matched, it’s entirely plausible that the team with the psychological edge ends up winning the contest.
One way of testing this is looking at equalisers in knockout matches. Do teams who get themselves back into a game then convert this positive energy into extra time or penalty shootout victories? We know that in tennis, a player equalising in the fourth set, particularly from two sets down, has a better than 50/50 chance of winning the fifth set – but does this idea hold true in football?
One of the defining features of Sir Alex Ferguson’s final title-winning season at Manchester United was his team’s ability to win matches from losing positions. They found themselves behind on 16 occasions in 2012-13, and took 29 points from these games.
Whilst Ferguson was undoubtedly a master of late and come-from-behind victories, you have the question the sustainability of winning games in this nature so often.
Looking at Premier League teams from the start of the 2006-07 season, unsurprisingly we see that most teams will find themselves behind in games as often as they were the previous season.
There’s another method I want to visit – the Borda Count, a variant of which is used in the Eurovision Song Contest.
Using this method, a team gets the most points for each first preference vote, less points for second preference votes and so on.