Skip to content

How much is a clean sheet worth?

10 December 2011

Bayern Munich's Manuel Neuer leads the way for Bundesliga clean sheets this season (Image: Flickr/sdhansay)

In September last year Soccer By The Numbers tested a suggestion from Mike Forde, Chelsea’s Performance Director, that there is a “stronger correlation between clean sheets and where you finish than goals scored and where you finish.”

The post found a clean sheet to be worth roughly the same as three goals; that is if you fail to concede you can expect the same amount of points on average as if you score three goals in a match. It’s a startling statistic, giving credence to the idea that good teams are built ‘from the back’.

I thought I’d expand this across two seasons worth of data (2009/10 and 2010/11) and compare the ‘big four’ leagues. The chart below illustrates the comparison for goals conceded; a team that keeps a clean sheet can expect, on average, between 2.6 and 2.7 points per game across these leagues.

Clean sheets are worth the least in Italy, no great surprise given the Serie A produced more 0-0s (65) than any other of the three leagues over the two seasons. Overall, the trends match those found in the aforementioned Soccer By the Numbers article, with the most stark difference in expected points between one and two goals conceded.

There is no great variation between the leagues, though it appears conceding two goals in the German Bundesliga isn’t as catastrophic as in other major European leagues, with teams collecting 0.77 points on average compared to around 0.6 in England, Spain and Germany.

The big interest is a comparison with goals scored; three goals (2.7-2.8 points) are worth only marginally more than a clean sheet in the last two seasons.

Again, a clean sheet is perhaps worth even more than most realise. Of course the data merely accounts for the ‘average’ team – the best teams will find that clean sheets are even more valuable given their propensity to score.

In the context of the current Premier League season, the numbers look good for Swansea, who have been particularly stingy with goals conceded at home. Often compared to Blackpool, the Swans have already kept as many clean sheets as the 2010 play-off winners, whose consistent defensive failures ultimately cost them their place in the top flight. A lack of goals should not concern Brendan Rodgers yet.

Equally, Manchester United have discovered (domestically at least) the value of keeping it tight at the back following their humbling defeat to Manchester City at home.

So, across Europe it appears swashbuckling attacking intent is perhaps a weaker strategy than a conservative defensive approach, if such a trade-off exists. Unfortunately, it’s not always the best way to please fans.

7 Comments leave one →
  1. 19 December 2011 1:40 pm

    Hi there,if you’re quantifying a clean sheet as part of a conservative defensive strategy,then you’ve got to account for the points you lose when you try to keep games tight and your opponents do manage a goal or two.

    Overtly defensive strategies tend to work best for underdogs with limited attacking options.AVB seems to be coming round to realising that a defensive strategy isn’t the best one for a well resourced team like Chelsea who can buy expensive strikers.

    • 19 December 2011 1:58 pm

      True, I think a distinction needs to be made between a defensive strategy aimed at keeping clean sheets, and generally being able to keep clean sheets through an able, organised defence.

      • 28 December 2011 10:12 pm

        That is probably true and means that an attacking approach is still the most efficient way of playing, not only because it can co-exist with a strong defence but also because it offers more protection should a goal be conceeded than a more negative approach.

  2. 16 February 2023 6:49 am

    Hii great reading your blog


  1. Concede or not to concede? – The value of goals in the Eredivisie « 11 tegen 11
  2. Premier League passing trends « 5 Added Minutes
  3. Premier League passing trends so far in 2011/12 « 5 Added Minutes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: